|
|
|
|
The core component of the problok Hyper-Shield is the Policy and Risk Management element. Most organisations may have addressed this component in the past; however, these policies have to be re-visited regularly to ensure that the organisations business units create the accurate input, before any of the other components of the puzzle are implemented. |
||
|
In essence, it promotes a policy first, products second approach to a Policy enforcement procedure. So through skilled personnel, distribute the security policy, support the policy, support the connections, counter the threats, and automation and enforcement will follow automatically. |
||
|
Today, senior executives remain solely responsible for any unfortunate occurrence in the day to day operation of their companies |
||
|
Without senior management buy-in or commitment to security policies, IT security staff will configure and implement all security products in a vacuum, at significant risk and cost to everyone employed or associated with the organisation in any way whatsoever. |
||
|
The accurate input from business units should contain; |
||
|
|
||
|
To ensure that the end-user will benefit by selecting and implementing the problok Hyper-Shield, the justification of such a solution must contain; |
||
|
|
||
|
Compliance and enforcement of RICA (the Interception Act), the Archive Act, Sarbanes Oxley, HIPPA, the Privacy Act and others are essential components built into the problok Hyper-Shield. These best practice components are to the benefit of all in the organisation. The Policy Management element dictates that the policy is set, all the processes are in place, the technology is implemented end to end, and Service Level Agreements will allow proper management of cost apportionment and charge back practices. |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |